TODAY'S DATE

WorldsLastChance.com Calendar

  ?

mm / dd / year

 

Response » Luni-solar: You Ask, We Answer » WorldsLastChance.com Discussion Invitation

The following is an invitation letter sent to WorldsLastChance.com inviting them discuss the "Lunar Sabbath" belief that they adopted in a public forum, so that visitors can see and compare both sides.

 

Notice: Understanding this subject is of eternal value; until WorldsLastChance.com accepts our invitation to discuss the topic, we encourage visitors not to take anything they read as fact until they study and compare both sides.

 

It has been days since our invitation has been sent ...

 

Dear WorldsLastChance Team,

 

In holding on to the Sabbath truth, we are receiving response from visitors searching the internet to see whether the material concerning a Lunar Sabbath is correct. Because of the large financial investment in advertisement WorldsLastChance is putting, a considerable amount of people are reading your material on a Lunar Sabbath, thus resulting in doubt and confusion.

 

An interesting factor is that WorldsLastChance makes the bold claim that they have made the shocking discovery from the Bible that the seventh-day Sabbath cannot be found except on the Creator's calendar.” This “discovery” actually was brought up years ago and soon disregarded by Bible scholars, but has recently been readopted and remarketed by WorldsLastChance. We ask today that WorldsLastChance hold responsibility for their marketing of this belief and answer the doubts and questions being brought up by the viewers and accept our invitation for a debate. This debate will be hosted on ProofDirectory, and only two parties will have access to post, however, all can view it. Both parties will hold accountability to engage in the agreed rules of debate.

 

We believe that in this time there will be many distractions to diverge away from God’s truth. It is time to end the dispute, and reach out for those afflicted in confusion. It is time to provide a source for them to see both views and to compare. If this “new light” is as factual as so boldly claimed throughout WorldsLastChance, then upon public study and discussion it will shine out in obvious truth, however, if the founding truth of the Sabbath remains unchanged as stone, as we believe it is, then it will remain to shine.

 

Please accept our invitation and appeal to hold responsibility for the minds you are confusing by engaging in a public debate.

 

God bless you.

Sincerely,

ProofDirectory Team

 

Response from WLC Team »

(Response in black | Reply in Blue)

Dear WorldsLastChance Team,

 

Thank you for taking the time to reply to our email. Why was our invitation met back with accusations of being Satanic, and judged as related to the men who tried to harm Nehemiah? We have not judged you, but merely invited you to share your thoughts publically with wondering minds. We are inviting you to do so on our website, because we have been banned from WLC. We have heard from 3rd persons, that this was because we spammed. I personally sent a few messages within the limit, but why were the rest banned?

 

In response to your email, please refer below:

You wrote:

I received the following invitation from former team members, who have left us for various reasons (only Yahuwah can read hearts); for certain 2 out of the 5 who left the team, have done so months before I learned anything about the Lunisolar light. They, now, want to engage us in a debate. I feel like the history of Nehemiah is being repeated, and that his famous and wise words of Nehemiah 6:3 "I am doing a great work, so that I cannot come down: why should the work cease, whilst I leave it, and come down to you?" would be most fitting as a response to their dubious invitation.

 

Dear WLC team member,

Yes, hearts can not be discerned or judged by men, and as a clarification please note that those 2 former team members you referred to continued to voluntarily work on email responses on WLC, until WLC adopted the current interpretation of a lunisolar calendar. The reply of Nehemiah 6:3 also appears to be a "unanimous" agreement, but please understand that we are in no way trying to separate you from doing "a great work", but on the contrary, are inviting you to continue in a public reach out for that work. This is just an extension to the very work you are already doing. Also, the intentions of the men calling Nehemiah down was to cause him harm. Is that how you see us? 

We appreciate your consideration in this.


 

You wrote:
It is my very STRONG conviction that we have no business in ever engaging in a debate, whether as the ProofDirectory team has proposed or even individually when we are sharing with acquaintances.  We have no business stepping onto enchanted ground and engaging in dialogue with someone who has turned his back on truth and whose mind may be under the influence of fallen angels.   When we enter into a debate, we are entering into combat with a mind that is more than human.  Nehemiah's response should be ours.  We have no need to debate.  Our invitation is the same to all:go study for yourself!! 

 

Dear WLC team member,

If it bothers you to look at this as a debate, then look at this as an opportunity to reach out, an opportunity to answer questions from the minds that are confused. Please don't see or judge that our minds may be "under the influence of fallen angels", for is it not true that fallen angels flea from the truth, rather then invite it? Yes debate, in a manner, is combat ground, and so is standing for the truth. Please do not confuse matters, for there is a need to debate. If you are prepared to preach the truth, you must be equally prepared to answer to it as well. We have studied both the pro and the counter, and we invite you all to do the same.


You wrote:
I believe that Nehemiah's example should be our example too: "I am doing a great work, so that I cannot come down: why should the work cease, whilst I leave it, and come down to you?"

Dear WLC team member,
Thank you for taking the time to respond :).


 

You wrote:

It is never our work to convince, that is the work of the Holy Spirit.  When any have rejected Truth, we are to follow the example of Yahushua, our Saviour.  When He was accused He opened not His month, He answered them not a word.
Our task is to present truth to those who are hungering and thirsting, not to debate and argue with those who have rejected truth.  We cannot afford the time from our work to enter into controversies that avail nothing. 
Let us put on the Armor of Truth and keep building up the breach that was made in the wall.  There is a crown of life laid up before us; let us take up the cross of being misunderstood and be faithful to the task that has been given us to take truth to all the waiting world.  Let not one penny or one voice give traffic to their website.  With all courtesy let us refuse their invitation.  Our views are easily available to them already on WLC.

 

Dear WLC team member,

You are correct, the Holy Spirit comes upon our hearts and helps us accept or refuse what is right or wrong. Please don't view the above request as a request to convince us, or anyone else, but as mentioned before, it's simply providing an opportunity for people to see both sides. As you stated, we must all be meek like Christ under persecution, but is that what 's going on now? Have we said any accusation for you to remain silent? As shared before, it is all of our jobs to share truth, but doesn't that job have a responsibility as well? I understand, as you mentioned, that you can not afford the time from your work to enter into this debate, but please understand that those who are going to freely volunteer for this debate are offering time outside their work for this cause.

You have shared your views on WLC, and most of it as fact, but is that really the case? Is the authenticity of your claims holding up to the word? This can only be cleared in dialogue, rather then silence.


 

You wrote:
They say that their reasons for wanting a debate is to provide a opportunity to see both sides and compare. Isn't that what the WLC Team is providing already and that is why some are questioning their side? Only Yah's Holy Spirit can convict no mater how much debate. So there is no reason for debate. Our ever important job is to provide Truth - not to debate it! There is already an opportunity to present any questions or concerns on the WLC website. The fact that they appear to be in turmoil over this issue is conformation that WLC is on the right track!

 

Dear WLC team member,

Is that what WLC is already providing? Are not accounts being banned from providing counter arguments? One was banned for providing "Spam" which was never reported, but why were the rest banned? Some without even a post, but for merely having a relation with us. As you said, only the Holy Spirit can convince, but is there not also a Spirit that can deceive? As mentioned before, it is an important job to provide the truth, but also to answer for it. Please do not judge that we are in turmoil over this issue and justify it as confirmation of your paths, but we are in turmoil over the souls being deceived. This is why we freely volunteered to make the website, because of this turmoil. In confidence of our beliefs and its truth, that only came with much study and prayer, we are inviting WLC for this discussion.


 

You wrote:
I would like to fourth Nehemiah 6:3.

 

Dear WLC team member,
Thank you for taking the time to respond :).


 

You wrote:
My reply fits to 3 lines of their 3rd paragraph:'We believe that in this time there will be many distractions to diverge away from [YAHUWAH'S] truth.'
My reply -     Agreed - so why add to it? 
'It is time to end the dispute, and reach out for those afflicted in confusion'.
My reply -  Agreed - WLC disputes with no one, and we reach out daily to those afflicted.
'It is time to provide a source for them to see both views and to compare.'
My reply - There are 66 books in the canon.

 

Dear WLC team member,
- Not add to it, but rather answer to it.

- There was no accusation that WLC was disputing, but rather that dispute was being caused from the seeds of doubt WLC was throwing. For this reason a request to end the confusion was sent.

- The 66 books of the canon provides both views to compare?


 

You wrote:
I agree with the invitation: GO STUDY FOR YOURSELF!!! That is what we all have done at the first place for this wonderful truth, entering no debate with any one, then why they can't do the same.
So, more than agree to apply Nehemiah 6:3, because I love not to any debate which is the method of the people of this world, not the method of Yahushua."...We are not of this world."

 

Dear WLC team member,

This is not a matter of requesting help for study, though if it was it should never be answered with "GO STUDY FOR YOURSELF!!!" As previously mentioned, this is just an opportunity to reach out. I ask you to also not see this as a debate, as you might be sensitive to the word, but a request to come preach, as the apostles did whenever a city requested for them to come.


You wrote:
I do believe the Bible advice us with these verses too:
Titus 3:9-11
  But avoid foolish questions, and genealogies, and contentions, and strivings about the law; for they are unprofitable and vain.10 A man that is an heretic after the first and second admonition reject; Knowing that he that is such is subverted, and sinneth, being condemned of himself. 
Nehemiah 6:3 I am doing a great work, so that I cannot come down: why should the work cease, whilst I leave it, and come down to you?

Dear WLC team member,

Thank you for your response, but may I ask you if questions to the belief you are preaching are considered foolish? Does Titus 3 really apply to this context?

As for Nehemiah 6:3, which seems to be a favorite among the group, but as mentioned before, are the intentions of the men who tried to call Nehemiah down like our intentions?


 

You wrote:
I was happy to read what u all wrote because it was very true in responding to such invitation, I truly believe that truth doesn't need debates to prove it. This  world is watching the 2 websites and all references are available for every truth lover. Personally, I had the opportunity to meet the former team and brother Sameh at the same time while I was asking and searching for Yahuwah's truth and they brought no biblical reasons for what they believe in.
I strongly invite them to GO AND STUDY FOR THEIR SELVES objectively and to stop rejecting these priceless truth pearls which are being revealed to us in these last days of the world and may Yahuwah truth shines on all who seek to live for Him.

 

Dear WLC team member,

"Such an invitation"? I truly believe that truth can not be debated, for it will remain to shine out. There is no debate with truth. In referring to the example you gave about the meeting, and the accusation of not providing any "Biblical reasons"; Did I not say I will send them all to you by email? Did I not do that and was never responded to?

We appreciate your advice to "Go and study ...", but as mentioned before, this is not an invitation for help to study which you are refusing, but merely an opportunity to preach, not write, your beliefs.


 

You wrote:
Obviously, this is a smart, move from ProofDirectory, they ask to host the debate on their website, the debate is presented as a way of helping "truth-seekers" and reaching out for "those afflicted in confusion", and assure us that if what we are preaching is true then it will remain so...
Humanly speaking, it seems convincing, but we are not to engage in such disputes with those who have openly and adamantly rejected light, as they admit they believe Satyrday is the Sabbath and it remains "unchanged as stone".
They already accuse us of confusing people, and in order to feel free of this guilt, we are called to engage in public debate. Look at the argument !
Thank Yahweh for the unanimity of opinion among the brethren, and thank you all for standing for the truth and not falling into a debate which would consume our energies to no avail.

 

Dear WLC team member,

Thank you for taking the time to analyze our "move". We would rather appreciate it if you put the same energy to engage rather then to analyze. We are judged because we hold on to our view of the Sabbath. We are judged for the English word of Saturday, which you even have to misspell, and ignore the majority of the languages that just call it Sabbath. Does "standing for the truth" mean not standing for the truth? Is an opportunity to really stand for the truth seen as a consumption of energy?


You wrote:
Debating is definitely a Satanic way of destroying Yahuwah's people, work and wasting their precious time. Those who wanted to be involved in a debate have the spirit of Satan. He or she always find ways how to win and if possible to destroy the person by finding their weaknesses. Therefore we have to reject that kind of invitation.

Dear WLC team member,

You call debating satanic? But what would you call discussing truth with those discussing? How do you define that? Does that mean we have spirit of satan in us? All we are asking is for one of you to take the time to respond to this opportunity to reach out for those who have questions, who want to hear both sides.


- Sharing Light with a Searching World -
Copyright © 2011-2012 by
WorldsLastChance.org